6-10 Team with Chase Daniel

[RobBlake]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

and after reading the OP of the linked thread, what are you disagreeing with?

Rodgers STILL holds the ball too long and STILL will never beat a team with an elite pass rush because he STILL takes too many sacks.

And Rodgers was, IMO, the best NFL QB THIS year.

However, he's been so/so in the postseason. This year, he has NO excuse. He shouldn't have gotten excuses two years ago, either. Even last year.

...and I'd still take Russell Wilson over Aaron Rodgers.

But again, that's a coin flip for me.

Flip Russell Wilson and Aaron Rodgers.. Seahawks rival the patriots dynasty.. the niners dynasty.. cowboys..

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by RobBlake

Flip Russell Wilson and Aaron Rodgers.. Seahawks rival the patriots dynasty.. the niners dynasty.. cowboys..

ok?

and the Hawks with Russell at the #1 seed in the NFC aren't already potentially going to be rivaling those aforementioned dynasties

?

...?

[RobBlake]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

ok?

and the Hawks with Russell at the #1 seed in the NFC aren't already potentially going to be rivaling those aforementioned dynasties

?

...?

yeah. ain't gonna happen with russell

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by RobBlake

yeah. ain't gonna happen with russell

oh

this is really brilliant insight

(I'm used to it with you)

the Seahawks are at -125 to win the NFC Championship

but again

thanks for that brilliant insight

[RobBlake]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

oh

this is really brilliant insight

(I'm used to it with you)

the Seahawks are at -125 to win the NFC Championship

but again

thanks for that brilliant insight

Dynasties are built on Superbowl rings, not NFCCGs. Seahawks are more than beatable neutral setting. Dallas has the best chance to beat them in that game you mention.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by RobBlake

Dynasties are built on Superbowl rings, not NFCCGs. Seahawks are more than beatable neutral setting. Dallas has the best chance to beat them in that game you mention.

totally agree

right now, on sportsbook, the Hawks and Pats are the favorites at 2.5 : 1

however, RobBlake said "ain't happening with Russ" so I certainly will not be betting on the Seahawks based off of this well researched and brilliant insight

so thanks a lot man; you really helped me out

[RobBlake]

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0

totally agree

right now, on sportsbook, the Hawks and Pats are the favorites at 2.5 : 1

however, RobBlake said "ain't happening with Russ" so I certainly will not be betting on the Seahawks based off of this well researched and brilliant insight

so thanks a lot man; you really helped me out

weren't the pats favored at 18-0 vs giants as you like to put it? idgaf about your sportsbook, but thanks for those "empircal" findings

[Brock]

Originally Posted by RobBlake

Flip Russell Wilson and Aaron Rodgers.. Seahawks rival the patriots dynasty.. the niners dynasty.. cowboys..

That's really a stupid post. Wow.

[RobBlake]

Originally Posted by Brock

That's really a stupid post. Wow.

I know you're not intelligent, just based off your QB analysis.. but can you comprehend an Elite QB and an Elite Defense? Can you try to comprehend the likelihood of winning multiple and consecutive ships would be greatly increased.. more so than RW who often posts sub 200 yard games and average performances relying on lynch and game changing defense? Prob not huh?

[Brock]

Originally Posted by RobBlake

I know you're not intelligent, just based off your QB analysis.. but can you comprehend an Elite QB and an Elite Defense? Can you try to comprehend the likelihood of winning multiple and consecutive ships would be greatly increased.. more so than RW who often posts sub 200 yard games and average performances relying on lynch and game changing defense? Prob not huh?

Well, nothing quite like judging the overall quality of a qb off of his first 3 years, but considering he won a super bowl and likely will again, I'm sure he'd take that. He's got a lot of time to work on his game. History's going to prove you wrong.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by Brock

Well, nothing quite like judging the overall quality of a qb off of his 3 years, but considering he won a super bowl and likely will again, I'm sure he'd take that. He's got a lot of time to work on his game. History's going to prove you wrong.

The guy probably followed Smith here and his NFCW hate is still strong.

[GoChargers]

Originally Posted by RobBlake

RW who often posts sub 200 yard games and average performances relying on lynch and game changing defense?

But but but, he's "the engine"!!!

Last year, the Seahawks won a playoff game in which Wilson threw for only 103 yards and ZERO touchdowns against a typical shitty Rob Ryan defense in large part because Lynch scored two touchdowns.

The following week, they were down 10-3 at halftime until Lynch had a 40-yard rushing touchdown to open things up in the third and spark the team. Then the defense came up clutch with three turnovers in the 4th quarter.

Wilson is a game manager with the easiest job imaginable.