Chiefs Charles to the Patriots?

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-02-2016, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

**** you and **** that.

Dumb as ****, as always.

Only a moron would pass on a second round pick for a 29 year old running back coming off his second ACL injury, whose game is predicated on slashing and cutting.

Chief Roundup · 04-02-2016, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dumb as ****, as always.

Only a moron would pass on a second round pick for a 29 year old running back coming off his second ACL injury, whose game is predicated on slashing and cutting.

I don't like the idea of getting rid of Charles, although for a 2cd round pick I just might have to pull the trigger on a trade like that.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-02-2016, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

I don't like the idea of getting rid of Charles, although for a 2cd round pick I just might have to pull the trigger on a trade like that.

With 3 picks in the top 60, the Chiefs could do serious damage in the draft.

If that was to happen (and I highly doubt it will), they could fill their CB and WR needs with great talent and have the opportunity to go with a DT/DE, LG or Safety with one of their second rounders.

I would be a massive talent haul that would solidify several positions for 4 years at minimum.

Otter · 04-02-2016, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Dumb as ****, as always.

Only a moron would pass on a second round pick for a 29 year old running back coming off his second ACL injury, whose game is predicated on slashing and cutting.

You jump on that quicker than Jenny Mccarthy 20 years ago after her 3rd martini.

Chief Northman · 04-02-2016, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter

You jump on that quicker than Jenny Mccarthy 20 years ago after her 3rd martini.

Interesting analogy. I like.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-02-2016, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter

You jump on that quicker than Jenny Mccarthy 20 years ago after her 3rd martini.

ThaVirus · 04-02-2016, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

If some team is dumb enough to trade a #2 for a 29 year old running back with two ACL surgeries, whose game is predicated on slashing and cutting, you do it.

And Charles is not the Chiefs "best" or most important offensive skill player.

It's a tie between Maclin and Kelce, although I lean Maclin at this point.

No one on this team is better at their job than Jamaal Charles. The only argument I'll even field is Houston. RB isn't a very important position, but one of those two players is our best, no doubt in my mind.

Your assessment of Jamaal's running style makes me question whether you've even watched any Chiefs games.. Or perhaps you watch them on a small screen?

Jamaal's a one-cut, downhill runner. That's likely why he's got the highest YPC averages in league history. There are no wasted movements with that guy. He sees the hit, he hits the hole. He's NOT a scatback.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 04-02-2016, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

No one on this team is better at their job than Jamaal Charles. The only argument I'll even field is Houston. RB isn't a very important position, but one of those two players is our best, no doubt in my mind.

Your assessment of Jamaal's running style makes me question whether you've even watched any Chiefs games.. Or perhaps you watch them on a small screen?

Jamaal's a one-cut, downhill runner. That's likely why he's got the highest YPC averages in league history. There are no wasted movements with that guy. He sees the hit, he hits the hole. He's NOT a scatback.

Maclin is the best at his job, no question about it.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-02-2016, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

No one on this team is better at their job than Jamaal Charles. The only argument I'll even field is Houston. RB isn't a very important position, but one of those two players is our best, no doubt in my mind.

Your assessment of Jamaal's running style makes me question whether you've even watched any Chiefs games.. Or perhaps you watch them on a small screen?

Jamaal's a one-cut, downhill runner. That's likely why he's got the highest YPC averages in league history. There are no wasted movements with that guy. He sees the hit, he hits the hole. He's NOT a scatback.

Yeah, he was sooooooooooooo important that two undrafted free agents led the Chiefs to a 11-1 record and a playoff win.

****ing dumb, as usual.

mcaj22 · 04-02-2016, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

No one on this team is better at their job than Jamaal Charles. The only argument I'll even field is Houston. RB isn't a very important position, but one of those two players is our best, no doubt in my mind.

Your assessment of Jamaal's running style makes me question whether you've even watched any Chiefs games.. Or perhaps you watch them on a small screen?

Jamaal's a one-cut, downhill runner. That's likely why he's got the highest YPC averages in league history. There are no wasted movements with that guy. He sees the hit, he hits the hole. He's NOT a scatback.

we will be almost 3 years removed from the last time Charles put up elite production for his position.

and really he only ever had 3 elite years. Maclin and Kelce are at least trending upward, and to a lesser degree Spencer Ware, also trending upward despite small sample size.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-02-2016, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22

we will be almost 3 years removed from the last time Charles put up elite production for his position.

and really he only ever had 3 elite years. Maclin and Kelce are at least trending upward, and to a lesser degree Spencer Ware, also trending upward despite small sample size.

Stop talking sense to ThaVirus.

He doesn't get it.

ThaVirus · 04-02-2016, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22

we will be almost 3 years removed from the last time Charles put up elite production for his position.

and really he only ever had 3 elite years. Maclin and Kelce are at least trending upward, and to a lesser degree Spencer Ware, also trending upward despite small sample size.

Not really. He led the entire league in TDs in 2013 and was, IIRC, second or third in total TDs in 2014 despite missing a couple games.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-02-2016, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Not really. He led the entire league in TDs in 2013 and was, IIRC, second or third in total TDs in 2014 despite missing a couple games.

And yet the Chiefs went 11-1 without him.

He's not as important as you believe.

Actually, it's not even close.

ThaVirus · 04-02-2016, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

And yet the Chiefs went 11-1 without him.

He's not as important as you believe.

Actually, it's not even close.

I don't believe I've argued his importance in this entire thread.

mcaj22 · 04-02-2016, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Not really. He led the entire league in TDs in 2013 and was, IIRC, second or third in total TDs in 2014 despite missing a couple games.

Yea 2013 was his last year of truly ELITE production

2016 - 2013 = 3

entering 3rd year since his last elite season.

2014 was hardly elite production, you don't get that season, Chris Ivory put up those stats this year for goodness sake. And by missed a couple games you mean he missed 1 lol