Bucs abused the defense...

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I've been very clear.

Even given clear common sense reasons, not sure why you are being a ****ing dumb ass today.

We scored. It took over 4 minutes.

I'm not betting we are going to do it again in two with no time outs.

Pretty clear what I'm saying here pete

that was for a td...not a fg

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by petegz28

that was for a td...not a fg

Has it been confirmed if Santos was available for a final FG? Didn't he kick the extra point? KCChiefs.com seems to be slow on releasing quotes for some strange reason. It's like a Nazi propagandists.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan

Has it been confirmed if Santos was available for a final FG? Didn't he kick the extra point? KCChiefs.com seems to be slow on releasing quotes for some strange reason. It's like a Nazi propagandists.

He kicked the extra point and got injured on the kick off is what they said in game

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by petegz28

that was for a td...not a fg

Again with that.

We bypassed a 54 yard fg with a healthy kicker due to wind. If we had started from the 30 you think we were going to get 45-50 yards and kick a fg with an injured kicker in the same conditions. All in under two minutes with no time outs?

Come on man that is no where near a given with this offense. You act as though it is.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Again with that.

We bypassed a 54 yard fg with a healthy kicker due to wind. If we had started from the 30 you think we were going to get 45-50 yards and kick a fg with an injured kicker in the same conditions. All in under two minutes with no time outs?

Come on man that is no where near a given with this offense. You act as though it is.

The wind in the 3Q, which is when we didn't go for it, is not the same in the 4th when we are going the other way. And you keep going back to this having to be a 54 yard kick.

Again, you are all over the map. If your argument was even incoherent you would be light years ahead of where you are now.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by petegz28

The wind in the 3Q, which is when we didn't go for it, is not the same in the 4th when we are going the other way. And you keep going back to this having to be a 54 yard kick.

Again, you are all over the map. If your argument was even incoherent you would be light years ahead of where you are now.

I've never said it had to be a 54 yard kick.

I've explained my argument multiple times, very clearly.

You just keep making things up. Me saying it had to be a 54 yard kick at the end is a case in point

Hint: I never once did.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I've never said it had to be a 54 yard kick.

I've explained my argument multiple times, very clearly.

You just keep making things up. Me saying it had to be a 54 yard kick at the end is a case in point

Hint: I never once did.

No, you just keep using to choose not kicking a 54 yard FG into the wind in the 3rd Q, down by 1 as your crutch for not being able to kick a FG of unknown distance with the wind at your back in the 4th Q to win the game.

Yeah, that's what you said

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by petegz28

No, you just keep using to choose not kicking a 54 yard FG into the wind in the 3rd Q, down by 1 as your crutch for not being able to kick a FG of unknown distance with the wind at your back in the 4th Q to win the game.

Yeah, that's what you said

Doubt forget that the kicker was healthy in the first instance and injured in the second also.
Convenient to leave that out

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Doubt forget that the kicker was healthy in the first instance and injured in the second also.
Convenient to leave that out

You have yet to detail the extent of said injury......