Football Bills/ Bengals [cancelled - process in OP] - Page 220

cmh6476 · 02:14 PM

In case anyone needs it spelled out, we would play at a neutral site if the AFCCG ends up being Chiefs vs. Bills. All other scenarios abide by the usual rules (so any other game the Chiefs play will be at home).

Old posts:

Spoiler!

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-05-2023, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

OTWP is a ****ing ALPHA dude.

Doesn't ever complain about the refs, or getting ****ed by the league. That's for pussies.

About time you recognize.

KC_Connection · 01-05-2023, 07:33 PM

Quote:

With the Bills and Bengals not playing, the seeding would be determined based on winning percentage. But that would create a perceived unfair advantage for the Chiefs, who would capture the No. 1 seed simply by beating the Raiders on Saturday — even though the Chiefs have lost to the Bills and the Bengals. The situation also creates a competitive disadvantage for the Bengals, who could have landed at No. 2 or even at No. 1 if they had won the game against the Bills.

As one source explained it to PFT, the owners will have to resolve some “controversial” aspects of finalizing the plan. The specific options for the owners currently aren’t known.

It also isn’t known whether the situation would be resolved by a simple majority or a 24-vote supermajority.

Regardless, the league has yet to make a decision. On Friday, the owners hopefully will do so.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ayoff-seeding/

"Perceived unfair advantage" for playing a full schedule, winning 14 games, and not skipping their toughest game of the season. Clark better fight this bullshit perception.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-05-2023, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy

Exactly.

As you said there's no option that is 100% fair but guess what? Life isn't fair. Just make a decision and lets go play some football.

Exactly. The league needs to make a goddamn decision and let’s move on.

**RealSNR** · 01-05-2023, 07:34 PM

The Chiefs are going to beat the Raiders and the Patriots are going to beat the Bills.

If the NFL feels the need to **** around and tweak shit after the Chiefs legitimately claim the 1 seed (and that includes this neutral field AFC Championship game garbage) then that's messed up.

**PHOG** · 01-05-2023, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15

Exactly. The league needs to make a goddamn decision and let’s move on.

They needed to do that Monday night. Now look at it.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-05-2023, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

The Chiefs are going to beat the Raiders and the Patriots are going to beat the Bills.

If the NFL feels the need to **** around and tweak shit after the Chiefs legitimately claim the 1 seed (and that includes this neutral field AFC Championship game garbage) then that's messed up.

If Mac Jones wasn’t a complete ****ing trainwreck, I’d agree completely.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-05-2023, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PHOG

They needed to do that Monday night. Now look at this.

They did, and it was the right call.

I’ve witnessed someone I care about getting CPR and AED and it’s something I could have gone 100 lifetimes without seeing.

PAChiefsGuy · 01-05-2023, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

Just because there's no option that is 100% fair doesn't mean that they're all equal or acceptable.

Nuance is really hard!

I know that and I know it is far more complicated than I am making it seem.

However, at the same time, this isn't some chemistry question that scientists have been trying to crack for past decade. I don't think it's a huge deal whatever decision they make basically is what I was getting at.

Hopefully the owners and Goodell make the right decision but regardless the Chiefs just need to prepare for their next opponent to the best of their ability and focus on what they can control.

comochiefsfan · 01-05-2023, 07:38 PM

No contest.

Winning percentage.

It's not perfect but it's the solution that causes the least disruption and therefore makes the most sense.

It's a complete no brainer.

Which of course means we're going to wind up with some ridiculously contrived bullshit.

**petegz28** · 01-05-2023, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan

No contest.

Winning percentage.

It's not perfect but it's the solution that causes the least disruption and therefore makes the most sense.

It's a complete no brainer.

Which of course means we're going to wind up with some ridiculously contrived bullshit.

It cannot be winning percentage when the total amount of games is different

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kcpasco · 01-05-2023, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15

Exactly. The league needs to make a goddamn decision and let’s move on.

League needs to make a decision that’s not dumb as ****. Poor leadership is ok in your book I guess.

Abba-Dabba · 01-05-2023, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

It cannot be winning percentage when the total amount of games is different

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy solution. Call the came they started that the Bills players don't want to finish.

KC_Connection · 01-05-2023, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

It cannot be winning percentage when the total amount of games is different

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's literally what the rules say it is (winning percentage) and it makes sense. Because why would/should a team ever benefit from not playing a game (unless you're the NFL and you're trying to figure out how to appease Buffalo).

**Bearcat** · 01-05-2023, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

OTWP is a ****ing ALPHA dude.

Doesn't ever complain about the refs, or getting ****ed by the league. That's for pussies.

Wait, is this some kind of passive aggressive championing/normalzing of being an insecure football fan with an inferiority complex who constantly cries about the refs and league?

Because yes... that is for pussies.

**DaFace** · 01-05-2023, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

It cannot be winning percentage when the total amount of games is different

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

.

01-03-2023, 08:15 AM
cmh6476 Keep Camp Home! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: St Joe MO Casino cash: $-893723	Bills/ Bengals [cancelled - process in OP] In case anyone needs it spelled out, we would play at a neutral site if the AFCCG ends up being Chiefs vs. Bills. All other scenarios abide by the usual rules (so any other game the Chiefs play will be at home). Old posts: Spoiler! The NFL will consider a neutral site for the AFC Championship Game. Full details: pic.twitter.com/oi3fItUWIj — Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) January 6, 2023 Breaking News: Of course the game is secondary to #DamarHamlin’s health, but #Bills insider @viccarucci just reported on @wgrz Daybreak that NFL commissioner Roger Goodell will make the call on rescheduling the Bills/Bengals game and it would have to be played within 2 days. — Melissa Holmes (@2MelissaHolmes) January 3, 2023 There is another option according to @viccarucci - the league can add a 19th week so the Bills/Bengals can get in all their games. @wgrz https://t.co/1X1hCHVN8c — Melissa Holmes (@2MelissaHolmes) January 3, 2023 I assume we'll hear something soon After speaking with both teams and NFLPA leadership, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell informed the clubs today that the Bills-Bengals game will not be resumed this week. The NFL has made no decision regarding the possible resumption of the game at a later date. — Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) January 3, 2023 Last edited by DaFace; 01-09-2023 at 02:14 PM..
Posts: 10,964

01-05-2023, 07:38 PM	#3294
comochiefsfan MVP Join Date: Dec 2018 Casino cash: $-1089600	No contest. Winning percentage. It's not perfect but it's the solution that causes the least disruption and therefore makes the most sense. It's a complete no brainer. Which of course means we're going to wind up with some ridiculously contrived bullshit.
Posts: 8,236	1 0