|
![]() |
#11 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $-910901
|
Quote:
What we're saying is that Moore has many supporters here who have cited very strong hands, good short area skills and physicality as his most valued attributes. And that those were the attributes that have been cited in saying he was a good pick at 54. I (and Detox I believe) are taking you on faith there and going ahead and GIVING him those attributes. And saying that he should be using them in the role presently occupied by JJSS. It's not saying he's a bad pick because we think he should play the JJSS role, it's saying that if he's a good pick, he's PERFECT for the JJSS role. Now you seem to think you want him out there WITH JJSS and that's where we keep getting back to the snap math. There just aren't as many out there as you think there are, especially when you start to look at the space on the field that Kelce, JJSS and Moore would all occupy. Suddenly you're looking at 3 underneath targets who do very little to threaten the deep/outer 1/3s. You're congesting your offense when you have all 3 of those guys on the field. Because no, he's not running Justin Watson and his 20 yard ADOT routes. Nor is he running MVS's routes. Then you watch the end around and bubble screen passes and realize he ain't running the Hardman stuff, at least not as well as Hardman (if he stays) or Toney (if Hardman doesn't). And he's not going to displace Toney as Toney has simply been obviously better than him. If you want to see Moore explode and you believe he can, putting him on the field WITH JJSS and Kelce isn't the answer. It's to put him on the field with Kelce and field stretchers like Hardman, Toney and MVS.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 66,901
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|