Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
Spot on.
Trading for Cassel allows this team to possibly be competitive AND let the youth develop at the same time.
If you think either Stafford or Sanchez is eventually going to develop into an elite QB, you take him. People act like it would be the worst possible scenario to have 2 legit QB's. I'm sure Packers fans are pissed beyond belief that Aaron Rodgers sat for 4 years.
If Cassel shows he can't get it done without Moss and Welker, then you have an even younger QB with more potential waiting in the wings.
If Cassel has a decent season, you can make a decision to sell him off to the highest bidder while his value is at its peak, or do the same with Stafford/Sanchez. Or keep both on the roster another year.
This isn't going to be a quick fix, folks. I'd much rather have the most important position on the field be a strength for the foreseeable future, than to take someone else at #3 because we felt we had no other choice.
|
 Reppity-Repp-Repp-Repp!
__________________
1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously.
100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO ****ing rings as a Head Coach.
CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020!
|