I like Herm's method better...

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Seriously, are you being ironic, obtuse or a moran? THEY DID TRY TO FILL THOSE SPOTS!

You just don't like who they choose. Put your own list together of who they should have taken based on who is available on the street right now.

I don't mind them signing free agents. I just don't like them signing guys that are that old and won't help the team win next year because they have no chance of even being on the team.

[Buehler445]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

I don't mind them signing free agents. I just don't like them signing guys that are that old and won't help the team win next year because they have no chance of even being on the team.

I'd venture a guess that most guys on the street right now won't be on the team either.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

I don't mind them signing free agents. I just don't like them signing guys that are that old and won't help the team win next year because they have no chance of even being on the team.

So you were all for dumping Gonzalez then, right?

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

So you were all for dumping Gonzalez then, right?

under the right circumstances, I would have been for trading Tony. But I don't think a 2nd next year was enough.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

under the right circumstances, I would have been for trading Tony. But I don't think a 2nd next year was enough.

That is the most you are going to get for a tight end that age. Even one as good as Tony.

Anyway, I agree with signing the stop gap vets and letting them play a year and replace them with superior younger talent next year. You can't fix all the holes in one offseason. Vrabel, Thomas, Goff, and Engram aren't going to be keeping young super studs off the field.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

under the right circumstances, I would have been for trading Tony. But I don't think a 2nd next year was enough.

Then you're a hypocrite. Gonzalez was old and was not going to be helping the team win in 3 years. Since the Chiefs aren't going to win this year, he needed to be gotten rid of so that the team could bring in a young player.

Your logic, not mine.

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Then you're a hypocrite. Gonzalez was old and was not going to be helping the team win in 3 years. Since the Chiefs aren't going to win this year, he needed to be gotten rid of so that the team could bring in a young player.

Your logic, not mine.

the logic behind it would be that Tony would be different than other players mentioned bc he could have such a huge effect on the QB.

Tony is in a different class than these other players and he could help the team by helping develop the QB. Developing the QB is something that could help down the road.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by kcbubb

the logic behind it would be that Tony would be different than other players mentioned bc he could have such a huge effect on the QB.

Tony is in a different class than these other players and he could help the team by helping develop the QB. Developing the QB is something that could help down the road.

JPB is right.

You are a hypocrite.

[kcbubb]

Originally Posted by milkman

JPB is right.

You are a hypocrite.

ummm... on somethings yes. on this topic. no.

If Tony could help bring Cassel along, it would help this team three years from now.

Who is Zach Thomas going to help three years from now??? give me a break.