Football This Sanchez Chap

Pioli Zombie · 09-28-2009, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Put Cassel on the Jets and he'd flourish. He'd magically stop making mental mistakes and being inaccurate on short to intermediate routes.

Put Sanchez on the Chiefs and he'd be a complete ****ing disaster. Any of the poise he's shown would be non-existent.

Yeah, Cassel hasn't shown he can throw for nearly 4,000 yards when he's surrounded by a real team. Oh wait......
Posted via Mobile Device

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

Yeah, Cassel hasn't shown he can throw for nearly 4,000 yards when he's surrounded by a real team. Oh wait......
Posted via Mobile Device

When we get Moss and Welker, then, we should be set.

He'll need to prove that he can also perform with less. Thus far, it's been a mixed bag. He pisses down his leg before half of the Raiders game, but also leads a nice drive late in the 4th.

This past week, he, generally, had very little time to operate. When he did, he was inconsistent.

Let's hope this improves. Right now, if I had to guess, Sanchez will always be the hammer that some fans (can rightfully) use to bludgeon Pioli.

4th and Long · 09-28-2009, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

This past week, he, generally, had very little time to operate. When he did, he was inconsistent.

When you are used to running for your life 90% of the time, it's a hard habit to break, even when you are actually afforded the time to survey the field and find an open receiver.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

When you are used to running for your life 90% of the time, it's a hard habit to break, even when you are actually afforded the time to survey the field and find an open receiver.

That's true.

He's playing under imperfect conditions, and it's a joke that we've handicapped him to this extreme.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-28-2009, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

That's true.

He's playing under imperfect conditions, and it's a joke that we've handicapped him to this extreme.

The offensive line is just fine.

You are NOT a GM and don't know what you're talking about.

Get back to us when you've actually WORKED in the NFL and then maybe, we'll take you seriously.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

The offensive line is just fine.

You are NOT a GM and don't know what you're talking about.

Get back to us when you've actually WORKED in the NFL and then maybe, we'll take you seriously.

Sorry, I was actually citing Sylvester Morris, so shut the **** up.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-28-2009, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Sorry, I was actually citing Sylvester Morris, so shut the **** up.

Mecca · 09-28-2009, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

When we get Moss and Welker, then, we should be set.

He'll need to prove that he can also perform with less. Thus far, it's been a mixed bag. He pisses down his leg before half of the Raiders game, but also leads a nice drive late in the 4th.

This past week, he, generally, had very little time to operate. When he did, he was inconsistent.

Let's hope this improves. Right now, if I had to guess, Sanchez will always be the hammer that some fans (can rightfully) use to bludgeon Pioli.

As I said in another thread.....If Matt Cassel is never good for us we should all be allowed to go out to the stadium and set Pioli's car on fire and throw donuts at his bald spot while calling him a fat doughy dipshit.

4th and Long · 09-28-2009, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

As I said in another thread.....If Matt Cassel is never good for us we should all be allowed to go out to the stadium and set Pioli's car on fire and throw donuts at his bald spot while calling him a fat doughy dipshit.

What a waste of perfectly good donuts!

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

As I said in another thread.....If Matt Cassel is never good for us we should all be allowed to go out to the stadium and set Pioli's car on fire and throw donuts at his bald spot while calling him a fat doughy dipshit.

I think the Cassel decision was a mistake, obviously.

But what I'm hopeful about is that perhaps there will be some type of unintended consequence that will cause us all to look back upon the decision in a different light.

For example, maybe we're in a position to acquire a ricockulous prospect--I'm talking P. Manning level--2 years from now, and we would have never done this with Sanchez on the roster...

Eh...whatever.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-28-2009, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

I think the Cassel decision was a mistake, obviously.

But what I'm hopeful about is that perhaps there will be some type of unintended consequence that will cause us all to look back upon the decision in a different light.

For example, maybe we're in a position to acquire a ricockulous prospect--I'm talking P. Manning level--2 years from now, and we would have never done this with Sanchez on the roster...

Eh...whatever.

Matt Barkley.

If he'll leave early.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Matt Barkley.

If he'll leave early.

Damn well could be.

And I know that I might get blasted for this, but Gabbert out of Mizzou has ridiculously impressive tools and intangibles. Spread be damned, I'd put him on the Chiefs roster today.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-28-2009, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Damn well could be.

And I know that I might get blasted for this, but Gabbert out of Mizzou has ridiculously impressive tools and intangibles. Spread be damned, I'd put him on the Chiefs roster today.

He's one of the most physically gifted quarterbacks I've ever seen.

The dude has Elway like mobility and arm strength with the size of Peyton Manning.

He's a ****ing prototype's prototype.

Mecca · 09-28-2009, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Matt Barkley.

If he'll leave early.

Like I said that's 3 years from now were talking an epic fail run to still be this bad in 3 years, if we've just been marginally bad or even improved some we won't be bad enough to get him...

If we've shown some improvement and Pioli is still here he isn't going to draft a QB with his boy here, he's not going to admit he ****ed up his big decision.

Mecca · 09-28-2009, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

I think the Cassel decision was a mistake, obviously.

But what I'm hopeful about is that perhaps there will be some type of unintended consequence that will cause us all to look back upon the decision in a different light.

For example, maybe we're in a position to acquire a ricockulous prospect--I'm talking P. Manning level--2 years from now, and we would have never done this with Sanchez on the roster...

Eh...whatever.

We're likely talking 3 years till there's another viable QB prospect and to be in position to get him we will have to have basically continued to be this bad for 3 more years...

If Pioli is still here Cassel is his guy and is still going to be out there playing QB. Sauto disageed with me but like I said if we're sitting here in 3 years and we're no better and Cassel is a bum...Pioli has gotta go.

If he was wrong on that Cassel decision he should lose his job.