|
|
10-02-2010, 09:19 PM
|
#37 |
|
King of Sarcasm
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: at home
Casino cash: $10004900
|
QB can't complete a pass when he is on his back. He can't throw an interception after he is sacked either. I can see the benefit of both but would rather get a sack if he was passing on 1st or 2nd down so you can have a chance at an INT on third and long. I definately want a sack if it takes them out of field goal range and forces a punt.
|
|
Posts: 2,159
  |
|
|
|
Sacking vs Pressuring the QB. Which is better (or more effective)?
Threaded Mode