Chiefs If not Luck... - Page 4

jlscorpio · 09-17-2011, 06:10 AM

While we may be in position to pick up Luck in the draft, my guess is we'll have a high pick, but maybe not the TOP pick. What about Landry Jones or Matt Barkley? Jones stock seems to be skyrocketing with every passing week, and Barkley's has always been relatively high. If we can't get Luck, I'd love to have one of these guys, especially Jones.

**ChiefGator** · 09-18-2011, 03:24 AM

Not impressed by Landry last night.

Chiefnj2 · 09-18-2011, 07:00 AM

Luck, Foles (!st half last night) and Landry all threw lots of short passes last night. If you want to watch a college game and be impressed by downfield passing the team is going to have to play a patsy or be more of a spread attack.

Foles is tough to evaluate since his team isn't all that great on the OL.

Reerun_KC · 09-18-2011, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Luck, Foles (!st half last night) and Landry all threw lots of short passes last night. If you want to watch a college game and be impressed by downfield passing the team is going to have to play a patsy or be more of a spread attack.

Foles is tough to evaluate since his team isn't all that great on the OL.

Calling bullshit here...

Cause a good QB makes his OL better... Same with the NFL..

Bump · 09-18-2011, 10:18 AM

what about that dude who plays for Arizona? Foles?

Bump · 09-18-2011, 10:18 AM

at this point, I'd trade a 2nd or 3rd for Chase ****ing Daniels and i hate Chase ****ing Daniels

milkman · 09-18-2011, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Calling bullshit here...

Cause a good QB makes his OL better... Same with the NFL..

I only watched the first half, but I was impressed Foles pocket presence and mobility, along with his arm and touch.

BillSelfsTrophycase · 09-18-2011, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump

at this point, I'd trade a 2nd or 3rd for Chase ****ing Daniels and i hate Chase ****ing Daniels

I hate Cassel as much as the next guy, but Chase Daniel?

jlscorpio · 09-18-2011, 01:52 PM

my thread has now officially been rendered null, since we will be taking Luck w/the #1 overall pick.

ToxSocks · 09-18-2011, 02:10 PM

Who are we going to beat, really? We'll win maybe 2-3 games. We should start looking at Luck.

oaklandhater · 09-18-2011, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

There is no way in hell the Chiefs can outsuck the Seahawks.

still feel that way after today.

Hammock Parties · 09-18-2011, 11:38 PM

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

Horror scenario: We go 1-15 and hold on to Cassel just in case we don't get Luck, we lose some dumb tiebreaker and draft 2nd, don't get Luck, trade down and pick up a RT, and start Cassel.

NJChiefsFan · 09-18-2011, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

I don't know. The vibe from this game, from Cassel's look on the sideline, to the tone Haley said some things in his presser with, I am thinking there might be a chance. I was a believer we wouldn't this year, but I got some hope today. Didn't hurt that Palko threw the worst throw of all time towards the sideline.

**RealSNR** · 09-18-2011, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck.

But we won't do that.

Horror scenario: We go 1-15 and hold on to Cassel just in case we don't get Luck, we lose some dumb tiebreaker and draft 2nd, don't get Luck, trade down and pick up a RT, and start Cassel.

I might just quit watching football altogether until Pioli is fired if that happened.

No way I subject myself to that rape

**mdchiefsfan** · 09-18-2011, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dilligaf

I'm all for him starting now. I'm tired of watching Cassel.

I understand this and would support it if the offseason weren't shortened. I fully believe that we need to let him practice and for God's sake make him active. Because 2/2 of our games we could have gave him some NFL experience. But we are activating players like Becht and Battle. UGH!!!

Barret · 09-18-2011, 11:54 PM

My question is this, Why is both Stanzi and Powe inactive?? Last yer we had almost all the rookies in the games and playing. I understand you can't have Stanzi in when you are still tied to Cassel but if you are getting blown out, why not get them adjusted to the NFL speed?

09-17-2011, 06:10 AM
jlscorpio Veteran Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Rapid City, SD Casino cash: $10004900	If not Luck... While we may be in position to pick up Luck in the draft, my guess is we'll have a high pick, but maybe not the TOP pick. What about Landry Jones or Matt Barkley? Jones stock seems to be skyrocketing with every passing week, and Barkley's has always been relatively high. If we can't get Luck, I'd love to have one of these guys, especially Jones.
Posts: 1,089

09-18-2011, 03:24 AM	#46
ChiefGator Can these boys not play? Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Northcentral Florida Casino cash: $6452956	Not impressed by Landry last night. __________________ - Mark
Posts: 4,706

09-18-2011, 07:00 AM	#47
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6654388	Luck, Foles (!st half last night) and Landry all threw lots of short passes last night. If you want to watch a college game and be impressed by downfield passing the team is going to have to play a patsy or be more of a spread attack. Foles is tough to evaluate since his team isn't all that great on the OL. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,541

09-18-2011, 10:18 AM	#49
Bump YOU take YOUR seat Join Date: Nov 2007 Casino cash: $-1674895	what about that dude who plays for Arizona? Foles?
Posts: 38,265

09-18-2011, 10:18 AM	#50
Bump YOU take YOUR seat Join Date: Nov 2007 Casino cash: $-1674895	at this point, I'd trade a 2nd or 3rd for Chase **ing Daniels and i hate Chase **ing Daniels
Posts: 38,265

09-18-2011, 01:52 PM	#53
jlscorpio Veteran Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Rapid City, SD Casino cash: $10004900	my thread has now officially been rendered null, since we will be taking Luck w/the #1 overall pick. __________________ For those who believe, no explanation is necessary; for those who don't believe, no explanation will do.
Posts: 1,089

09-18-2011, 02:10 PM	#54
ToxSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $2013063	Who are we going to beat, really? We'll win maybe 2-3 games. We should start looking at Luck. __________________ Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever.
Posts: 65,925

09-18-2011, 11:38 PM	#56
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $790478	A good GM/HC would start preparing Stanzi to start the last 8 games of the year to see if he has anything in the event we don't get Luck. But we won't do that. Horror scenario: We go 1-15 and hold on to Cassel just in case we don't get Luck, we lose some dumb tiebreaker and draft 2nd, don't get Luck, trade down and pick up a RT, and start Cassel. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 297,459

09-18-2011, 11:54 PM	#60
Barret Still Lurking Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: East Texas Casino cash: $1913790	My question is this, Why is both Stanzi and Powe inactive?? Last yer we had almost all the rookies in the games and playing. I understand you can't have Stanzi in when you are still tied to Cassel but if you are getting blown out, why not get them adjusted to the NFL speed?
Posts: 1,068