Be the GM

[Fritz88]

Originally Posted by milkman

Just say no to Manning.

Reasons Milkman?
Posted via Mobile Device

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Fritz88

Reasons Milkman?
Posted via Mobile Device

This is a team that is built for competing for the next 8 10 years.

You bring in Manning, with no clear plan for the future after Manning retires, you limit your window to 3 years, 4 years max.

It's the same thing they did with Montana.

It's the same thing the the Cardinals did with Warner.

You bring in an aging QB, if it doesn't work out in the limited window, you're ****ed for years after.

And in the SB era, only 3 or 4 QBs over the age of 33 have won the SB, and only 1 of those was on a team that brought him in late in his career.

[Fritz88]

Originally Posted by milkman

This is a team that is built for competing for the next 8 10 years.

You bring in Manning, with no clear plan for the future after Manning retires, you limit your window to 3 years, 4 years max.

It's the same thing they did with Montana.

It's the same thing the the Cardinals did with Warner.

You bring in an aging QB, if it doesn't work out in the limited window, you're ****ed for years after.

And in the SB era, only 3 or 4 QBs over the age of 33 have won the SB, and only 1 of those was on a team that brought him in late in his career.

Fair enough. I'll get Manning, if he's healthy, and draft a QB in 2013 and let him set and watch Manning.