Chiefs are 63m under the cap

[milkman]

Originally Posted by cabletech94

far as i've understood, it's a calendar issue. something with the new collective bargaining i believe. stupid.

but i'm sure there's negotiations going onbehind closed doors. gotta be. right?

I had never heard of the 30% rule until Parker mentioned it a few days ago.

After researching, as I understand it, a team can not extend a player's contract with more than a 30% increase.

So, in order for the Chiefs to pay Carr what he's worth, they have to let his contract expire.

Someone correct me if I have that wrong.