|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one do you pick? | |||
| Oregon, plus $601,000 annual stipend |
   
|
5 | 15.15% |
| California, plus $250,000 annual stipend |
  
|
27 | 81.82% |
| Gosh, I can't decide. |
  
|
1 | 3.03% |
| Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-14-2021, 05:05 PM
|
#9 |
|
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $-1465266
|
Yeah, this is California in a Walk. I'd much rather live in Oregon on 400 acres and the money than California on 2/3 of an acre. But that house is rough.
Probably the answer is I'd need to get some bids from contractors. I could definitely live in the guest house (I think that's where it's at?) while I un**** the main house. But the Cali house is good enough, you don't sign up to screw with it, I figure it's a 5 un**** project as break even at my age, and even with 700K, that might not happen. This  Is much better than This  But it would take a bunch of money to un****. |
|
Posts: 59,966
  |
 1
 0
|
|
|
Mansionmania Tournament: Round 2, Heat 13
Threaded Mode