Football This Sanchez Chap

Mecca · 09-28-2009, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

Longing for what? He's not the reason the Jets are 3-0. Its sounds like a nice story. but its just not the case.
Posted via Mobile Device

If you think they'd be 3-0 with Kellen Clemens under center I have some reality for you...

Pioli Zombie · 09-28-2009, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

If you think they'd be 3-0 with Kellen Clemens under center I have some reality for you...

We aren't comparing Sanchez and Clemens. There is no reason not to think they would be 3-0 with Cassel. And Cassel wouldn't be throwing for 165 yards. Give Cassel some players and he'd be having 280 to 300 yard games up there.
Posted via Mobile Device

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

We aren't comparing Sanchez and Clemens. There is no reason not to think they would be 3-0 with Cassel. And Cassel wouldn't be throwing for 165 yards. Give Cassel some players and he'd be having 280 to 300 yard games up there.
Posted via Mobile Device

Put Cassel on the Jets and he'd flourish. He'd magically stop making mental mistakes and being inaccurate on short to intermediate routes.

Put Sanchez on the Chiefs and he'd be a complete ****ing disaster. Any of the poise he's shown would be non-existent.

Pioli Zombie · 09-28-2009, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Put Cassel on the Jets and he'd flourish. He'd magically stop making mental mistakes and being inaccurate on short to intermediate routes.

Put Sanchez on the Chiefs and he'd be a complete ****ing disaster. Any of the poise he's shown would be non-existent.

Yeah, Cassel hasn't shown he can throw for nearly 4,000 yards when he's surrounded by a real team. Oh wait......
Posted via Mobile Device

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

Yeah, Cassel hasn't shown he can throw for nearly 4,000 yards when he's surrounded by a real team. Oh wait......
Posted via Mobile Device

When we get Moss and Welker, then, we should be set.

He'll need to prove that he can also perform with less. Thus far, it's been a mixed bag. He pisses down his leg before half of the Raiders game, but also leads a nice drive late in the 4th.

This past week, he, generally, had very little time to operate. When he did, he was inconsistent.

Let's hope this improves. Right now, if I had to guess, Sanchez will always be the hammer that some fans (can rightfully) use to bludgeon Pioli.

4th and Long · 09-28-2009, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

This past week, he, generally, had very little time to operate. When he did, he was inconsistent.

When you are used to running for your life 90% of the time, it's a hard habit to break, even when you are actually afforded the time to survey the field and find an open receiver.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

When you are used to running for your life 90% of the time, it's a hard habit to break, even when you are actually afforded the time to survey the field and find an open receiver.

That's true.

He's playing under imperfect conditions, and it's a joke that we've handicapped him to this extreme.

Mecca · 09-28-2009, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

When we get Moss and Welker, then, we should be set.

He'll need to prove that he can also perform with less. Thus far, it's been a mixed bag. He pisses down his leg before half of the Raiders game, but also leads a nice drive late in the 4th.

This past week, he, generally, had very little time to operate. When he did, he was inconsistent.

Let's hope this improves. Right now, if I had to guess, Sanchez will always be the hammer that some fans (can rightfully) use to bludgeon Pioli.

As I said in another thread.....If Matt Cassel is never good for us we should all be allowed to go out to the stadium and set Pioli's car on fire and throw donuts at his bald spot while calling him a fat doughy dipshit.

4th and Long · 09-28-2009, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

As I said in another thread.....If Matt Cassel is never good for us we should all be allowed to go out to the stadium and set Pioli's car on fire and throw donuts at his bald spot while calling him a fat doughy dipshit.

What a waste of perfectly good donuts!

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

As I said in another thread.....If Matt Cassel is never good for us we should all be allowed to go out to the stadium and set Pioli's car on fire and throw donuts at his bald spot while calling him a fat doughy dipshit.

I think the Cassel decision was a mistake, obviously.

But what I'm hopeful about is that perhaps there will be some type of unintended consequence that will cause us all to look back upon the decision in a different light.

For example, maybe we're in a position to acquire a ricockulous prospect--I'm talking P. Manning level--2 years from now, and we would have never done this with Sanchez on the roster...

Eh...whatever.

milkman · 09-28-2009, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Put Cassel on the Jets and he'd flourish. He'd magically stop making mental mistakes and being inaccurate on short to intermediate routes.

Put Sanchez on the Chiefs and he'd be a complete ****ing disaster. Any of the poise he's shown would be non-existent.

That's the thing.

In the shotgun or spread, he had remarkable accuracy.

Playing under center, he has yet to show any accuracy consistently.

**Smed1065** · 10-04-2009, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

We aren't comparing Sanchez and Clemens. There is no reason not to think they would be 3-0 with Cassel. And Cassel wouldn't be throwing for 165 yards. Give Cassel some players and he'd be having 280 to 300 yard games up there.
Posted via Mobile Device

Damn do not bring reality here!

Its a Sanchoke thread