|
![]() |
#11 | |
Kindness in words...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zion
Casino cash: $10025483
|
Quote:
And that's after playing the worst defensive lines in the league in the 2010 season. When we get a real schedule, it's not going to be pretty. Personally, I'd love a St. Louis situation. They picked up Bradford, but also Roger Saffold in the second round of that same draft. Saffold was a ****ing stud at LT for them in his rookie year. They've got a lot of additional holes to fill, but they have their foundations set now. The Chiefs got a lot of dog and pony show tricksters (McCluster, Arenas, Berry, etc.), but no substance where it counts. (Specifically the offensive line and the quarterback.) As I've stated before, if a football team has these three things, they can expect to win more than they lose: 1. Good quarterback 2. Protection for good quarterback 3. Pressure on opposing quarterback with using blitzes/tricks A good quarterback, given the time, will beat even the very best defenses. But you've got to give him the time. Who he's throwing to is almost a non-consideration. (Look at the Pats Super Bowl teams and tell me who would be considered an elite receiver.) Chiefs have none of these things other than possibly #3 with Hali. |
|
Posts: 15,450
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|