Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
New England has great ownership, Belichick and Tom Brady.
We have none of those.
Indianapolis has great ownership, a great front office (who built 3 contenders) and Peyton Manning.
Pittsburgh has great ownership, Polamalu, Hampton, and Roethlisberger.
Our problem is that we have no organizational philosophy aside from "Just do exactly what happened in New England".
Well, no two scenarios are exactly the same.
The reason why a guy like Mike Tomlin is a good coach is b/c he's a Tampa 2 guy but he realizes his talent works best in a 3-4, so he doesnt' **** with it. Pittsburgh also drafts to the strength of the draft (which is why they drafted multiple OL in the mid-late rounds last year, and got a guy like Mike Wallace and a better 5 tech at 32 than we did at 3)
|
Okay, well if our ownership sucks, I don't know what you want. What is your solution other than cheering for Pittsburgh? These people are already taken, and the ones you're saying work in these organizations IMO are the same style of people we've taken from NE. With both groups its whether or not this person has anything to do with the success of the team.
I don't see any difference between doing what we're doing now, and doing what you're proposing other than basing it around different teams. The people are different, but its not like there's any less of a risk either way. I don't see a difference in risk hiring Weis than anyone in the Steeler organization that they are actually willing to part with. And a difference in talent is something neither you nor I can accurately measure, nor anyone else can. So that's a moot point.